real biathlon
    • Athletes
    • Teams
    • Races
    • Seasons
    • Scores
    • Records
    • Blog(current)
    • More
      Patreon Content Course Profiles Explanations Shortcuts
      Error Report
      Privacy Policy About
    •     
  • Forum
  • Patreon
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
    Instagram
    Facebook

Recent Articles

  • Most improved athletes this winter
  • New biathlon point system
  • Historic biathlon results create expectations. But what about points?
  • What do you expect? Practical applications of the W.E.I.S.E.
  • Introducing W. E. I. S. E: the Win Expectancy Index based on Statistical Exploration, version 1

Categories

  • Biathlon Media
  • Biathlon News
  • Long-term trends
  • Statistical analysis
  • Website updates

Archives

  • 2022
    • December
    • June
    • May
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2021
    • December
    • November
    • September
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • August
    • June
    • March
  • 2015
    • December
  • 2013
    • August
    • July
  • 2012
    • July

Search Articles

Recent Tweets

Tweets by realbiathlon

What’s more important, Shooting or Skiing?

Posted on 2020-08-25 | by real biathlon

The sport of biathlon combines two disciplines, shooting and cross-country skiing. That leads to the obvious question which of those two elements has the bigger effect on the overall result.


I came up with the idea to use the three statistical values which I talk about often – shooting percentage, shooting time and skiing speed – and put them into relation with the Overall World Cup rank. One way to do that is by looking at the data as a system of linear equations (a general system looks like this):

Of course the four sets of data are incompatible (i.e. the World Cup rank is a dimensionless quantity, the shooting time has a physical dimension, seconds). A way around is making all four values ranks, more precisely a ranking for each category among athletes with World Cup points. That leads to a linear system which looks something like this:

This system of linear equations is overdetermined, i.e. there are more equations than unknowns, and inconsistent, i.e. it has no solution. Luckily there are ways to finding an approximate solution, for example the method of least squares. Technically speaking, he linear system Ax = b has the approximate (least squares) solution x = (A’A)-1A’b.


After finding the least squares solution, the ratio between x1, x2 and x3 gives us the approximate influence of the shooting percentage, the shooting time and the skiing speed for an athlete’s World Cup rank.

 Men   Non-Team 
       Shooting %
          Shooting 
Time
Skiing 
          Speed %
Top 100.190.130.67
Top 200.490.010.50
Top 300.50-0.040.54
Top 400.230.060.71
Top 600.260.100.64
Top 104     0.240.070.70
Average:0.320.050.63
Influence of Shooting and Skiing on World Cup rank | Men
(0 = no effect, 1 = single factor)

Among all 104 male athletes who won World Cup points last season, the skiing speed was clearly the most important factor. The skiing speed influence on the World cup rank varied between 50 % and 71 %, depending on what group you look at.

There is the very unusual effect that for the men’s top 20 and top 30 athletes the shooting percentage briefly becomes very important, while it plays a much smaller role overall (top 104) and for the top 10. My best guess would be that that’s the region where the chart of the overall skiing pace flattens out, and therefore the shooting briefly becomes a more important factor.

 WomenNon-Team 
     Shooting %
          Shooting 
Time
Skiing 
          Speed %
Top 100.240.100.66
Top 200.290.090.62
Top 300.430.050.53
Top 400.350.060.60
Top 600.230.020.75
Top 98        0.170.020.81
Average:0.280.060.66
Influence of Shooting and Skiing on World Cup rank | Women  
(0 = no effect, 1 = single factor)

The results for the women don’t look fundamentally different. The skiing speed is slightly more important (81 %) for where an athlete is eventually ranked in the Overall World Cup. Also just like the men’s data, there is the same curious effect that the shooting percentage effect reaches its maximum for the top 30 athletes.

Some general observations:

  • The skiing pace is the most important factor for every group listed above. Overall its influence on the World Cup rank last season was about 65 % on average, pretty much across the board, both for men and women.
  • Shooting percentages play a lesser, but still significant role, with a 25-30 % influence. 
  • While shooting times have by far the smallest effect, it’s not negligible. The shooting speed accounts for about one sixth to one seventh of the total shooting influence. 

The Overall World Cup rank last season was (very roughly) determined like this: Shooting accuracy 30 %, Shooting speed 5 %, Skiing speed 65 %. Interestingly, that seems to be true for men and women alike.

About Post Author

real biathlon

Creator of the website realbiathlon.com

See author's posts

Facebook0Tweet0Pin0LinkedIn0Email0Print0
Posted in Statistical analysis | Tagged shooting, skiing

Post navigation

Canadian performances in Biathlon since 2000
The Queen of Pursuit

2 comments

  • Pingback: Improvements season-to-season – real biathlon
  • Pingback: Importance of Skiing and Shooting in biathlon – real biathlon

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Recent Articles

  • Most improved athletes this winter
  • New biathlon point system
  • Historic biathlon results create expectations. But what about points?
  • What do you expect? Practical applications of the W.E.I.S.E.
  • Introducing W. E. I. S. E: the Win Expectancy Index based on Statistical Exploration, version 1

Categories

  • Biathlon Media
  • Biathlon News
  • Long-term trends
  • Statistical analysis
  • Website updates

Archives by Month

  • 2022: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2021: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2020: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2015: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2013: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2012: J F M A M J J A S O N D

Search Articles

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!