Shooting Efficiency comparison: First trimester 2019–20 vs. First trimester 2020–21

Following up on my last post on skiing speed, this is a comparison of overall shooting quality between trimester 1 of last season and trimester 1 this winter. Shooting Efficiency is an attempt to combine shooting accuracy and shooting time. For more details how it’s calculated, see here.

If you can’t find a specific athlete, you can always look up the complete World Cup field (also available per trimester) for the ongoing season (as well as all previous seasons) here:

2020–21 Shooting Efficiency: Men | Women

Note: Only athletes with at least 4 non-team races in trimester 1 of both the previous and the current season are included in the tables below. Shooting Efficiency is an overall shooting score, combining shooting accuracy and shooting time. It is the theoretical average time an athlete loses through shooting (based on hit rate, range time and potential penalty loops)

Men

Erik Lesser is the most improved shooter among regular starters, losing 2:06.6 min in a theoretical sprint at the range. He has always been fast, which hasn’t changed this year, however, his accuracy is currently at a career high (87.9%). Simon Eder is the best shooter overall (incredible 96.4% hit rate), also much improved over last year. Sturla Holm Lægreid isn’t far behind (1:56.2 min) – he doesn’t show up in the table, because his first World Cup race was in March. Johannes Thingnes Bø has been struggling with his shooting so far, his accuracy is down 4.2% (albeit on a very high level), plus he shoots 2.0s slower.

Changes in Shooting Efficiency compared to 2019–20 | World Cup Trimester 1

No	Family Name	Given Name	Nation	Races	Hit Rate	Range Time	Penalty Loop	Time Loss Sprint	Change
No	Family Name	Given Name	Nation	Races	Hit Rate	Range Time	Penalty Loop	Time Loss Sprint	Change
1	Lesser	Erik	GER	9	87.86	50.0	21.9	2:06.6	-35.1
2	Guigonnat	Antonin	FRA	9	90.71	52.7	22.9	2:06.6	-21.5
3	Strolia	Vytautas	LTU	7	80.00	55.0	22.9	2:35.7	-21.4
4	Eder	Simon	AUT	9	96.43	49.3	23.1	1:46.9	-19.4
5	Samuelsson	Sebastian	SWE	9	89.29	53.3	21.3	2:09.4	-16.6
6	Hasilla	Tomas	SVK	6	77.50	53.7	23.8	2:40.9	-14.2
7	Moravec	Ondrej	CZE	9	87.14	50.6	22.7	2:10.3	-13.8
8	Ponsiluoma	Martin	SWE	9	81.43	50.1	21.4	2:20.0	-11.4
9	Nelin	Jesper	SWE	9	75.71	53.3	21.7	2:39.3	-11.2
10	Krcmar	Michal	CZE	9	90.00	53.6	21.4	2:08.5	-10.3
11	Weger	Benjamin	SUI	9	86.43	52.6	22.5	2:15.8	-9.0
12	Ermits	Kalev	EST	8	76.67	53.3	22.9	2:39.9	-8.4
13	Garanichev	Evgeniy	RUS	5	93.75	52.0	24.4	1:59.2	-6.2
14	Dombrovski	Karol	LTU	7	87.00	56.6	22.7	2:22.7	-5.6
15	Sinapov	Anton	BUL	6	80.00	51.5	24.7	2:32.4	-5.2
16	Hofer	Lukas	ITA	9	82.86	51.5	20.0	2:17.4	-5.1
17	Fak	Jakov	SLO	9	92.14	51.7	21.4	2:00.3	-2.0
18	Doll	Benedikt	GER	9	87.14	50.8	22.0	2:09.9	-1.7
19	Fillon Maillet	Quentin	FRA	9	92.14	50.1	21.6	1:57.3	-1.0
20	Christiansen	Vetle Sjaastad	NOR	9	90.00	53.6	21.8	2:09.0	-0.4
21	Femling	Peppe	SWE	8	81.67	50.1	22.5	2:21.5	-0.1
22	Nordgren	Leif	USA	6	81.25	53.7	24.1	2:32.6	-0.0
23	Pryma	Artem	UKR	8	80.00	50.9	23.1	2:28.1	+1.4
24	Latypov	Eduard	RUS	9	85.00	55.1	21.9	2:22.9	+1.8
25	Bormolini	Thomas	ITA	5	87.14	52.9	21.8	2:13.8	+1.9
26	Hiidensalo	Olli	FIN	6	76.25	55.7	23.1	2:46.1	+2.1
27	Claude	Fabien	FRA	9	80.00	50.9	21.0	2:23.8	+2.5
28	Rastorgujevs	Andrejs	LAT	8	80.83	53.7	21.4	2:28.4	+3.5
29	Doherty	Sean	USA	8	80.00	52.1	22.7	2:29.5	+5.4
30	Jacquelin	Emilien	FRA	9	90.00	49.2	20.4	1:58.7	+6.1
31	Gow	Scott	CAN	6	76.25	50.7	23.6	2:37.5	+6.2
32	Eberhard	Julian	AUT	8	78.33	52.3	21.6	2:31.3	+6.5
33	Pidruchnyi	Dmytro	UKR	8	80.00	49.2	22.5	2:23.5	+9.2
34	Yaliotnau	Raman	BLR	7	69.00	54.2	22.9	2:59.6	+9.6
35	Peiffer	Arnd	GER	7	90.00	52.4	21.9	2:06.6	+10.6
36	Dale	Johannes	NOR	9	87.14	56.3	22.2	2:21.0	+11.1
37	Seppala	Tero	FIN	8	78.33	53.4	21.5	2:33.3	+11.4
38	Desthieux	Simon	FRA	9	83.57	51.6	21.5	2:18.7	+11.6
39	Dovzan	Miha	SLO	6	86.25	49.4	24.1	2:11.8	+11.9
40	Tkalenko	Ruslan	UKR	5	76.67	49.4	22.7	2:31.7	+13.0
41	Kuehn	Johannes	GER	8	80.00	56.0	20.7	2:33.4	+13.1
42	Leitner	Felix	AUT	7	84.00	58.2	22.6	2:32.6	+13.3
43	Iliev	Vladimir	BUL	6	75.00	54.5	22.0	2:44.2	+13.4
44	Bjoentegaard	Erlend	NOR	5	85.71	55.7	20.9	2:21.1	+14.7
45	Vaclavik	Adam	CZE	6	73.75	56.1	23.5	2:54.0	+14.8
46	Bocharnikov	Sergey	BLR	8	80.83	53.4	24.8	2:34.3	+16.4
47	Guzik	Grzegorz	POL	7	72.00	52.4	22.7	2:48.5	+17.4
48	Windisch	Dominik	ITA	5	75.71	55.2	20.9	2:41.1	+17.6
49	Trsan	Rok	SLO	6	85.56	49.8	23.4	2:13.4	+18.0
50	Eliseev	Matvey	RUS	9	90.00	49.7	22.5	2:01.8	+18.5
51	Boe	Tarjei	NOR	9	85.71	53.5	20.6	2:16.4	+18.8
52	Boe	Johannes Thingnes	NOR	9	87.86	52.0	21.3	2:09.8	+20.8
53	Langer	Thierry	BEL	7	81.00	54.5	22.3	2:31.5	+23.5
54	Dudchenko	Anton	UKR	6	80.00	55.3	24.4	2:39.6	+25.9
55	Claude	Florent	BEL	6	77.50	58.5	21.8	2:46.2	+29.5
56	Bauer	Klemen	SLO	7	74.00	49.9	23.2	2:40.1	+30.4
57	Loginov	Alexander	RUS	9	85.00	51.7	22.4	2:16.9	+30.8
58	Stvrtecky	Jakub	CZE	7	64.00	58.8	21.7	3:15.7	+38.8

Women

Suvi Minkkinen is the most improved among women – she had a horrible December 2019, where she only managed to hit 66.0% of her targets. World Cup leader, Marte Olsbu Røiseland, is currently 11.9% more accurate than during trimester 1 last season. The results for Hanna Öberg (best shot overall) haven’t changed much, neither has the efficiency of Dorothea Wierer; her problems are almost exclusively skiing-related. Denise Herrmann is roughly 10s faster overall at the range (but in a sprint her 1.5% slower skiing loses her almost twice as much on the tracks).

Changes in Shooting Efficiency compared to 2019–20 | World Cup Trimester 1

No	Family Name	Given Name	Nation	Races	Hit Rate	Range Time	Penalty Loop	Time Loss Sprint	Change
No	Family Name	Given Name	Nation	Races	Hit Rate	Range Time	Penalty Loop	Time Loss Sprint	Change
1	Minkkinen	Suvi	FIN	7	85.00	52.7	25.9	2:24.3	-46.1
2	Frolina	Anna	KOR	6	76.25	55.7	25.7	2:52.4	-42.3
3	Kadeva	Daniela	BUL	5	85.00	54.9	27.1	2:30.4	-32.0
4	Kocergina	Natalja	LTU	5	80.00	57.1	26.8	2:47.8	-31.1
5	Dunklee	Susan	USA	8	78.33	55.8	26.2	2:48.4	-28.2
6	Roeiseland	Marte Olsbu	NOR	9	88.57	52.2	23.9	2:11.8	-26.8
7	Reid	Joanne	USA	6	83.75	1:00.7	25.1	2:42.1	-20.3
8	Colombo	Caroline	FRA	8	81.67	54.4	25.5	2:35.6	-19.1
9	Tomingas	Tuuli	EST	7	83.00	58.0	25.3	2:39.0	-17.2
10	Tachizaki	Fuyuko	JPN	8	85.00	59.2	25.9	2:37.2	-16.2
11	Alimbekava	Dzinara	BLR	9	90.00	54.7	24.0	2:13.4	-15.4
12	Lunder	Emma	CAN	9	91.43	52.5	25.1	2:06.6	-14.2
13	Cadurisch	Irene	SUI	6	82.50	49.5	25.8	2:24.3	-13.4
14	Oeberg	Elvira	SWE	9	86.43	53.4	24.5	2:20.1	-13.0
15	Semerenko	Valentina	UKR	5	90.00	52.8	25.6	2:11.2	-11.6
16	Herrmann	Denise	GER	9	83.57	54.2	23.7	2:27.4	-10.4
17	Klemencic	Polona	SLO	6	75.00	56.7	25.9	2:58.1	-9.0
18	Hinz	Vanessa	GER	7	86.00	55.1	25.4	2:25.7	-8.6
19	Schwaiger	Julia	AUT	7	87.00	56.7	25.3	2:26.3	-8.0
20	Knotten	Karoline Offigstad	NOR	9	91.43	51.1	25.5	2:04.0	-7.8
21	Lescinskaite	Gabriele	LTU	5	85.00	1:01.1	25.7	2:40.7	-6.7
22	Oeberg	Hanna	SWE	9	90.00	49.6	24.3	2:03.5	-5.1
23	Davidova	Marketa	CZE	9	82.14	57.1	24.0	2:37.0	-4.4
24	Kryuko	Iryna	BLR	7	91.25	1:00.3	25.2	2:22.6	-3.6
25	Braisaz-Bouchet	Justine	FRA	9	80.71	56.6	22.9	2:37.5	-2.7
26	Wierer	Dorothea	ITA	9	91.43	51.3	24.5	2:03.6	-1.2
27	Hojnisz-Starega	Monika	POL	6	86.67	55.7	25.1	2:24.8	-1.1
28	Gasparin	Elisa	SUI	7	82.00	53.1	25.1	2:31.3	-0.3
29	Egan	Clare	USA	9	85.00	59.2	24.3	2:34.8	+2.1
30	Haecki	Lena	SUI	8	79.17	50.3	24.9	2:32.6	+2.8
31	Mironova	Svetlana	RUS	6	78.75	55.4	24.6	2:43.0	+4.9
32	Todorova	Milena	BUL	8	76.67	56.8	24.7	2:51.2	+5.7
33	Gasparin	Aita	SUI	7	84.00	53.7	26.2	2:29.3	+7.4
34	Hauser	Lisa Theresa	AUT	9	84.29	53.6	23.4	2:24.1	+7.9
35	Bescond	Anais	FRA	9	82.86	57.8	23.6	2:36.1	+8.0
36	Simon	Julia	FRA	9	82.86	50.1	24.8	2:22.7	+8.6
37	Brorsson	Mona	SWE	8	85.83	54.4	24.8	2:24.0	+8.8
38	Sola	Hanna	BLR	8	70.77	52.9	24.3	2:56.8	+9.0
39	Vittozzi	Lisa	ITA	9	82.14	54.3	23.9	2:31.3	+9.9
40	Preuss	Franziska	GER	9	86.43	51.8	23.6	2:15.7	+10.7
41	Eckhoff	Tiril	NOR	9	84.29	55.7	23.7	2:28.5	+11.0
42	Beaudry	Sarah	CAN	7	78.00	52.6	26.4	2:43.4	+13.2
43	Sanfilippo	Federica	ITA	5	75.71	58.4	25.6	2:58.9	+13.2
44	Zuk	Kamila	POL	7	78.00	1:01.1	25.7	2:58.7	+14.0
45	Eder	Mari	FIN	6	73.75	1:01.7	24.9	3:08.7	+14.1
46	Tandrevold	Ingrid Landmark	NOR	9	85.71	56.4	23.8	2:26.8	+14.2
47	Oja	Regina	EST	5	71.67	53.7	24.5	2:56.9	+14.4
48	Puskarcikova	Eva	CZE	7	80.00	51.3	27.4	2:37.3	+14.4
49	Jislova	Jessica	CZE	7	78.00	57.2	25.9	2:51.4	+15.6
50	Gasparin	Selina	SUI	6	75.00	58.0	24.4	2:57.0	+15.7
51	Blashko	Darya	UKR	9	92.14	56.9	26.0	2:14.1	+17.0
52	Persson	Linn	SWE	9	85.00	54.3	24.6	2:25.5	+19.9
53	Dzhima	Yuliia	UKR	7	86.00	56.9	25.2	2:29.0	+20.1
54	Voronina	Tamara	RUS	5	84.00	52.2	26.6	2:27.1	+21.2
55	Pidhrushna	Olena	UKR	5	84.29	55.7	26.5	2:33.0	+21.2
56	Zbylut	Kinga	POL	7	74.00	56.7	24.7	2:57.6	+24.1
57	Charvatova	Lucie	CZE	7	63.75	52.1	23.9	3:10.9	+28.1
58	Talihaerm	Johanna	EST	6	76.25	1:00.8	26.3	3:03.9	+31.3
59	Chevalier	Chloe	FRA	8	79.17	58.8	24.5	2:48.7	+32.6
60	Innerhofer	Katharina	AUT	8	65.83	55.6	23.9	3:12.8	+38.0

About Post Author

real biathlon

Creator of the website realbiathlon.com

See author's posts

Facebook9 Tweet0 Pin0 LinkedIn0 Email0 Print0

Shooting Efficiency comparison: First trimester 2019–20 vs. First trimester 2020–21

Men

Women

About Post Author

real biathlon

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Recent Articles

Categories

Archives by Month

Search Articles