real biathlon
    • Athletes
    • Teams
    • Races
    • Seasons
    • Scores
    • Records
    • Blog(current)
    • More
      Patreon Content Videos Explanations Shortcuts
      Error Report
      Privacy Policy About
    •     
  • Forum
  • Patreon
  • X
  • YouTube
    Instagram
    Facebook

Recent Articles

  • Junior + U23 Development Index – Men
  • Junior + U23 Development Index – Women
  • The Path to GOAT Status
  • Most improved athletes this winter
  • New biathlon point system

Categories

  • Biathlon Media
  • Biathlon News
  • Long-term trends
  • Statistical analysis
  • Website updates

Archives

  • 2024
    • March
  • 2023
    • March
  • 2022
    • December
    • June
    • May
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2021
    • December
    • November
    • September
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • August
    • June
    • March
  • 2015
    • December
  • 2013
    • August
    • July
  • 2012
    • July

Search Articles

Recent Tweets

Tweets by realbiathlon

Most improved athletes of last season

Posted on 2022-03-28 | by real biathlon

Improvements in Total Performance Scores of regular World Cup athletes season-to-season. The last row of both tables shows changes in overall scores for the 2021โ€“22 season compared to performances one season earlier (only athletes who appeared in at least half the races each season). You can do your own season-to-season comparisons for all stats in the Patreon bonus area.


Note: The scores are standard scores (or z-scores), indicating how many standard deviations (SD) an athlete is back from the World Cup mean (negative values indicate performances better than the mean). The Total Performance Score is calculated by approximating the importance of skiing, hit rate and shooting pace using the method of least squares (for more details, see here and here), and then weighting each z-score value accordingly.


Men

2021โ€“22 z-Scores compared to 2020โ€“21 | Non-Team events

Winning his first top 10 result this season, American Paul Schommer was the most improved male athlete, with career bests both in terms of shooting accuracy and ski speed. Vytautas Strolia also managed his first career top 10 this winter, coming second on this list, mostly thanks to skiing almost 2% faster than last year. In contrast, Martin Ponsiluoma and Sturla Holm Lรฆgreid both underperformed compared to 2020โ€“21, even though Lรฆgreid managed to finish the season strong and repeated his 2nd place in the overall standings.

Quentin Fillon Maillet only improved marginally over last winter (1.3% better hit rate, 0.5% faster skiing), but it was more than enough to win his first Overall World Cup title comfortably. Johannes Thingnes Bรธ had by far the worst shooting stats of his career (82.1% hit rate, a whole 10% lower than only two seasons ago), however, he was still the field’s fastest skier and he delivered when it counted most in Beijing, winning 4 Olympic gold medals.

2021โ€“22 z-Scores compared to 2020โ€“21 | Non-Team events

NoFamily NameGiven NameNationRacesSki Speed
Score
Hit Rate
Score
Range Time
Score
Total
Performance
Score
Change
NoFamily NameGiven NameNationRacesSki Speed
Score
Hit Rate
Score
Range Time
Score
Total
Performance
Score
Change
1SchommerPaulUSA
18-0.18-0.68-0.35-0.35-0.45
2StroliaVytautasLTU
23-0.67-0.51-0.15-0.56-0.35
3DudchenkoAntonUKR
14-0.65-0.810.59-0.55-0.27
4SmolskiAntonBLR
19-1.19-0.690.20-0.88-0.22
5FemlingPeppeSWE
14-0.44-0.81-0.95-0.61-0.21
6LatypovEduardRUS
14-1.34-0.62-0.28-1.01-0.21
7SeppalaTeroFIN
25-1.03-0.50-0.45-0.80-0.19
8KuehnJohannesGER
21-1.210.02-0.03-0.71-0.18
9ChristiansenVetle S.NOR
24-1.24-1.24-0.52-1.15-0.17
10KobonokiTsukasaJPN
20-0.09-1.04-0.11-0.37-0.14
11LesserErikGER
20-1.01-1.21-1.44-1.12-0.14
12ReesRomanGER
25-0.75-1.25-0.17-0.82-0.11
13Fillon MailletQuentinFRA
26-1.55-1.19-1.01-1.38-0.09
14BormoliniThomasITA
25-0.58-0.66-0.60-0.60-0.09
15BrownJakeUSA
19-0.80-0.000.71-0.39-0.08
16ClaudeFabienFRA
24-1.17-0.10-1.00-0.84-0.07
17LangerThierryBEL
14-0.32-0.340.26-0.25-0.06
18GowScottCAN
16-0.45-0.23-1.10-0.46-0.05
19StvrteckyJakubCZE
18-0.830.680.84-0.19-0.05
20DollBenediktGER
25-1.28-0.63-0.45-0.99-0.04
21WegerBenjaminSUI
18-0.76-1.24-0.32-0.85-0.03
22LeitnerFelixAUT
23-0.67-0.80-0.31-0.66-0.02
23GuigonnatAntoninFRA
21-0.90-0.39-0.92-0.75-0.01
24SamuelssonSebastianSWE
24-1.44-0.62-0.54-1.09+0.02
25DesthieuxSimonFRA
26-1.18-0.81-0.51-0.99+0.02
26GowChristianCAN
18-0.18-1.24-1.00-0.58+0.03
27DovzanMihaSLO
15-0.06-0.78-1.16-0.40+0.06
28LoginovAlexandrRUS
18-1.41-0.26-0.14-0.92+0.08
29PidruchnyiDmytroUKR
14-0.91-0.07-0.20-0.58+0.09
30BoeTarjeiNOR
22-1.31-0.92-0.28-1.07+0.09
31BionazDidierITA
14-0.33-0.190.81-0.16+0.09
32ZahknaReneEST
150.34-0.720.02-0.00+0.10
33NelinJesperSWE
17-0.900.370.38-0.38+0.11
34JacquelinEmilienFRA
25-1.28-0.44-1.04-1.01+0.11
35IlievVladimirBUL
18-0.880.590.48-0.29+0.13
36KrcmarMichalCZE
25-0.79-0.660.01-0.65+0.14
37ClaudeFlorentBEL
20-0.24-0.530.24-0.27+0.14
38EderSimonAUT
25-0.57-1.31-1.19-0.86+0.14
39BoeJohannes T.NOR
17-1.78-0.40-0.28-1.20+0.21
40LaegreidSturla HolmNOR
23-1.35-0.90-0.90-1.17+0.22
41PonsiluomaMartinSWE
23-1.390.59-0.86-0.75+0.22
42DohertySeanUSA
21-0.430.26-0.36-0.22+0.24
43WindischDominikITA
18-0.770.490.00-0.31+0.24
44MukhinAlexandrKAZ
15-0.110.740.980.26+0.24
45HoferLukasITA
24-0.82-0.96-0.30-0.80+0.28
46GuzikGrzegorzPOL
140.160.910.540.42+0.30
47SimaMichalSVK
150.190.120.210.17+0.30
48KomatzDavidAUT
18-0.05-0.800.51-0.20+0.34
49SinapovAntonBUL
130.011.040.960.42+0.57

Women

Jessica Jislovรก was the most improved athlete on the women’s side, skiing roughly 1% faster than last season and raising her non-team hit rate by 13.9% (among regular World Cup athletes, she was the 4th-most accurate overall). She is followed by Deedra Irwin, who managed the United States’ best ever non-team result in Olympic history, and Sweden’s Anna Magnusson, who got her stats almost back to her 2016โ€“17 level, her career best season.

While Marte Olsbu Rรธiseland did improve over last winter (-0.2%), her performance uptick wasn’t as extreme as you might expect. Last year’s World Cup winner Tiril Eckhoff was worse, but according to this metric only marginally (+0.1%); in fact, her hit rate didn’t change much at all (-2.1%). Clearly, it’s sometimes more important when you miss your shots, not so much how you average out over a season.

2021โ€“22 z-Scores compared to 2020โ€“21 | Non-Team events

NoFamily NameGiven NameNationRacesSki Speed
Score
Hit Rate
Score
Range Time
Score
Total
Performance
Score
Change
NoFamily NameGiven NameNationRacesSki Speed
Score
Hit Rate
Score
Range Time
Score
Total
Performance
Score
Change
1JislovaJessicaCZE
25-0.59-1.11-0.49-0.73-0.62
2IrwinDeedraUSA
19-0.33-0.510.32-0.31-0.54
3MagnussonAnnaSWE
16-0.84-0.40-0.51-0.67-0.52
4LieLotteBEL
22-0.39-1.03-0.87-0.63-0.44
5OebergElviraSWE
24-1.79-0.51-1.06-1.33-0.42
6SolaHannaBLR
18-1.620.28-1.10-1.01-0.41
7BrorssonMonaSWE
21-1.00-0.70-0.83-0.89-0.40
8FialkovaIvonaSVK
19-1.060.66-0.26-0.47-0.39
9ChevalierChloeFRA
20-1.14-0.17-0.28-0.76-0.34
10MinkkinenSuviFIN
17-0.10-1.21-0.78-0.50-0.27
11Braisaz-BouchetJustineFRA
25-1.840.42-0.50-1.02-0.26
12TodorovaMilenaBUL
18-1.020.19-0.00-0.55-0.26
13Chevalier-BouchetAnaisFRA
24-1.22-0.51-1.48-1.05-0.26
14RoeiselandMarte OlsbuNOR
24-1.66-1.09-1.34-1.45-0.20
15AlimbekavaDzinaraBLR
19-1.39-0.77-0.49-1.10-0.19
16TomingasTuuliEST
18-0.66-0.160.45-0.39-0.18
17SimonJuliaFRA
25-1.27-0.13-1.74-0.99-0.17
18TachizakiFuyukoJPN
18-0.26-0.650.20-0.32-0.15
19KlemencicPolonaSLO
17-0.200.48-0.060.02-0.15
20BescondAnaisFRA
25-1.25-0.07-0.20-0.78-0.15
21MaedaSariJPN
15-0.760.960.43-0.12-0.12
22OjaReginaEST
16-0.090.21-0.60-0.06-0.08
23NigmatullinaUlianaRUS
18-1.01-0.50-0.14-0.76-0.08
24TandrevoldIngrid L.NOR
23-1.31-0.70-0.18-1.00-0.08
25HerrmannDeniseGER
23-1.55-0.34-0.18-1.04-0.08
26EderMariFIN
24-1.300.520.51-0.56-0.07
27OebergHannaSWE
24-1.560.03-1.79-1.13-0.05
28HettichJaninaGER
16-0.88-0.44-0.82-0.75-0.05
29GasparinAitaSUI
13-0.39-0.58-1.09-0.53-0.05
30EganClareUSA
18-0.63-0.350.11-0.46-0.05
31GasparinElisaSUI
13-0.48-0.20-1.00-0.46-0.04
32DavidovaMarketaCZE
25-1.41-0.46-0.20-0.99-0.03
33PerssonLinnSWE
22-1.23-0.30-0.57-0.89-0.03
34MironovaSvetlanaRUS
15-1.07-0.19-0.21-0.72-0.02
35KazakevichIrinaRUS
18-1.020.170.49-0.49-0.00
36HauserLisa TheresaAUT
26-1.10-0.81-1.53-1.06+0.00
37CharvatovaLucieCZE
20-0.930.77-0.23-0.36+0.01
38VittozziLisaITA
20-1.050.96-1.40-0.51+0.04
39HaeckiLenaSUI
22-0.88-0.09-1.24-0.69+0.04
40AvvakumovaEkaterinaKOR
13-0.34-0.150.86-0.14+0.05
41ReidJoanneUSA
16-0.520.420.12-0.17+0.09
42PreussFranziskaGER
17-1.35-0.58-0.76-1.06+0.09
43KruchinkinaElenaBLR
13-0.700.190.26-0.33+0.09
44ZukKamilaPOL
14-0.790.680.42-0.22+0.10
45KnottenKaroline O.NOR
18-0.41-0.60-1.80-0.63+0.10
46LeshchankaIrynaBLR
14-0.79-0.070.77-0.40+0.10
47EckhoffTirilNOR
21-1.70-0.22-0.77-1.16+0.11
48HinzVanessaGER
21-0.80-0.53-0.02-0.63+0.11
49PuskarcikovaEvaCZE
160.00-0.31-0.65-0.17+0.12
50WiererDorotheaITA
25-1.08-0.46-1.46-0.95+0.15
51Hojnisz-StaregaMonikaPOL
19-0.74-0.58-0.09-0.61+0.19
52ZdoucDunjaAUT
13-0.04-0.95-1.27-0.45+0.20
53BendikaBaibaLAT
19-0.820.33-0.39-0.44+0.22
54LienIdaNOR
19-1.240.710.22-0.50+0.24
55LunderEmmaCAN
17-0.26-0.21-1.46-0.39+0.29
56DzhimaYuliiaUKR
19-0.990.14-0.10-0.55+0.30
57DunkleeSusanUSA
150.03-0.020.290.04+0.38
58SchwaigerJuliaAUT
14-0.37-0.280.60-0.23+0.38
59GasparinSelinaSUI
15-0.690.73-0.07-0.20+0.48
60TalihaermJohannaEST
140.29-0.240.540.17+0.49

About Post Author

real biathlon

Creator of the website realbiathlon.com

See author's posts

Facebook16Tweet0Pin0LinkedIn0Email0Print0
Posted in Statistical analysis

Post navigation

Who were the best performing biathletes at the Beijing Olympics?
Peak age for biathletes at the World Cup level

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Recent Articles

  • Junior + U23 Development Index – Men
  • Junior + U23 Development Index – Women
  • The Path to GOAT Status
  • Most improved athletes this winter
  • New biathlon point system

Categories

  • Biathlon Media
  • Biathlon News
  • Long-term trends
  • Statistical analysis
  • Website updates

Archives by Month

  • 2024: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2023: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2022: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2021: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2020: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2015: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2013: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2012: J F M A M J J A S O N D

Search Articles