real biathlon
    • Athletes
    • Teams
    • Races
    • Seasons
    • Scores
    • Records
    • Blog(current)
    • More
      Patreon Content Course Profiles Explanations Shortcuts
      Error Report
      Privacy Policy About
    •     
  • Forum
  • Patreon
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
    Instagram
    Facebook

Recent Articles

  • Most improved athletes this winter
  • New biathlon point system
  • Historic biathlon results create expectations. But what about points?
  • What do you expect? Practical applications of the W.E.I.S.E.
  • Introducing W. E. I. S. E: the Win Expectancy Index based on Statistical Exploration, version 1

Categories

  • Biathlon Media
  • Biathlon News
  • Long-term trends
  • Statistical analysis
  • Website updates

Archives

  • 2022
    • December
    • June
    • May
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2021
    • December
    • November
    • September
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • August
    • June
    • March
  • 2015
    • December
  • 2013
    • August
    • July
  • 2012
    • July

Search Articles

Recent Tweets

Tweets by realbiathlon

Shooting percent over the last 14 years

Posted on 2015-12-25 | by real biathlon

Two years ago I first looked at long-term trends in biathlon statistics, mainly to find out whether today’s athletes are better than previous generations, and how performance levels in the sport are developing in general. I now had another look at it, in order to see if anything had changed during the last two seasons (I haven’t included the currently ongoing season, because partial stats can be misleading). Here are the non-team shooting percentages over the last 14 seasons.
The stats are for the men’s and women’s overall World Cup top 40 (per season). I looked at their non-team percentages, split into quartiles. Quartiles divide the data into four equal groups (of 25 % each), i.e. the grey space between the 1st and 3rd quartile in the chart represents 50 % of the top 40 athletes. Unlike standard statistical methods, such as the average, the use of quartiles (like the median = 2nd quartile) is statistically a more robust method and more resistant to outliers. 

In men’s World cup races, both the top 40’s median and the top 40’s average has improved by more than 3% since 2001–02. Last season was one of the best years shooting-wise, only the maximum (most accurate shooter) is clearly lower than in past years (in the first half of the last decade), but the median and 1st/3rd quartiles were at an all-time high in 2014–15, continuing the upward trend since the early 2000s. The worst shooter of the top 40 hits over 70% since 2009–10, before that the worst shooter always had a hit rate below 70%.

Top 40 2001
–02
  2002
–03
  2003
–04
  2004
–05
  2005
–06
  2006
–07
  2007
–08
  2008
–09
  2009
–10
  2010
–11
  2011
–12
  2012
–13
  2013
–14
  2014
–15
  Diff. 
Maximum91.192.392.792.092.492.188.989.390.090.988.990.691.990.3-0.8
1st quartile85.285.984.786.185.887.084.985.786.086.186.387.387.387.6+2.4
Median81.983.283.382.683.783.181.883.083.784.683.885.285.385.8+3.8
3rd quartile79.080.178.777.778.877.279.679.381.080.881.783.282.983.2+4.2
Minimum69.268.166.567.169.466.968.663.071.975.372.872.875.874.5+5.3
2001
–02
2002
–03
2003
–04
2004
–05
2005
–06
2006
–07
2007
–08
2008
–09
2009
–10
2010
–11
2011
–12
2012
–13
2013
–14
2014
–15
Diff.
Top 10 avg84.282.782.087.784.287.883.985.484.785.485.887.086.886.6+2.4
Top 20 avg83.584.382.284.584.485.883.883.683.684.784.686.585.786.2+2.8
Top 40 avg81.583.081.981.882.482.281.582.183.383.783.784.785.084.9+3.4
Top 60 avg81.081.580.381.182.282.281.281.581.982.682.584.184.383.9+2.9
Diff.–difference between 2001–02 and 2014–15 seasons

The women’s shooting results look very similar to the men’s. For the last 14 seasons they have been creeping higher, although not by quite as much. They improved by more than 2%  (the mean is currently 2.3% higher, the average is 2.5% higher than 2001–02). For 2014–15, the men’s median shooter was slightly better than the women’s (85.8% vs. 84.7%), although there have been seasons where it was the other way around.

Top 40 2001
–02
  2002
–03
  2003
–04
  2004
–05
  2005
–06
  2006
–07
  2007
–08
  2008
–09
  2009
–10
  2010
–11
  2011
–12
  2012
–13
  2013
–14
  2014
–15
  Diff. 
Maximum88.992.489.090.393.391.591.892.691.089.094.395.191.192.6+3.7
1st quartile84.686.183.285.085.286.086.287.186.685.385.287.686.786.9+2.3
Median82.483.080.380.383.082.484.082.185.083.682.285.384.384.7+2.3
3rd quartile78.878.478.478.478.079.581.279.781.981.376.978.980.382.0+3.2
Minimum65.668.264.064.562.866.273.872.975.869.570.871.175.069.8+4.2
2001
–02
2002
–03
2003
–04
2004
–05
2005
–06
2006
–07
2007
–08
2008
–09
2009
–10
2010
–11
2011
–12
2012
–13
2013
–14
2014
–15
Diff.
Top 10 avg83.384.681.281.284.884.185.784.285.983.886.182.985.185.7+2.4
Top 20 avg81.384.381.382.683.783.984.484.485.782.884.483.385.384.8+3.5
Top 40 avg81.382.180.281.181.782.483.783.084.483.081.783.483.983.8+2.5
Top 60 avg80.480.779.479.881.181.482.181.983.681.881.381.782.882.7+2.3
Diff.–difference between 2001–02 and 2014–15 seasons



The shooting results in general continue to improve across the board. It’s impossible to say by how much exactly, results differ a lot depending on what group you look at or what method you use. To put a number on it, I’d say non-team shooting percentages are roughly 2-3% higher now than they were back in 2001–02. It’s unclear how much they can improve further before hitting a ceiling, because unlike ski speed, the hit rate has an absolute limit at 100%.

About Post Author

real biathlon

Creator of the website realbiathlon.com

See author's posts

Facebook0Tweet0Pin0LinkedIn0Email0Print0
Posted in Long-term trends | Tagged shooting

Post navigation

Who shoots better: Men or Women?
Shooting Time over the last 14 years

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Recent Articles

  • Most improved athletes this winter
  • New biathlon point system
  • Historic biathlon results create expectations. But what about points?
  • What do you expect? Practical applications of the W.E.I.S.E.
  • Introducing W. E. I. S. E: the Win Expectancy Index based on Statistical Exploration, version 1

Categories

  • Biathlon Media
  • Biathlon News
  • Long-term trends
  • Statistical analysis
  • Website updates

Archives by Month

  • 2022: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2021: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2020: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2015: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2013: J F M A M J J A S O N D
  • 2012: J F M A M J J A S O N D

Search Articles

Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!